Overview
The Hilbert class field gives a Galois interpretation of ideal classes. A group originally defined by multiplying ideals becomes the automorphism group of a distinguished extension of the number field. This converts the question whether a prime ideal is principal into a question about its splitting in that extension.
This is a specific consequence of global class field theory. The full theory also treats abelian extensions with ramification, using ray class groups or idele class groups; the Hilbert class field alone does not classify those extensions.
Prerequisites
Know finite Galois extensions, decomposition of prime ideals, ramification indices and the ordinary ideal class group. A Frobenius automorphism acts on a finite residue field by a power map. Idele groups are needed only for the proof outline, which assumes the existence and reciprocity theorems of global class field theory.
Definition and conventions
Fix an algebraic closure of a number field . Its ordinary Hilbert class field is the maximal abelian extension of that is unramified at every finite prime and in which every real place splits completely. Equivalently, form the compositum of all finite abelian extensions with these properties; class field theory proves that the compositum is finite.
The condition at a real place says that its extensions remain real, rather than becoming complex. Authors sometimes use “unramified” only for finite primes. Allowing real places to become complex can produce a larger class field corresponding to the narrow class group. Here the ordinary convention agrees with the existing ideal-class-group entry. Zhang, Proposition 3.76 and its preceding paragraph explicitly makes this distinction.
Intuition
A principal ideal is trivial after passing to the class group. Reciprocity realizes the same triviality as an identity automorphism. The extension packages all ideal classes simultaneously, so prime splitting tests their classes without selecting generators.
“Maximal” is relative to the fixed base and to abelian extensions. Iterating Hilbert class fields changes the base at each stage. A tower can therefore continue beyond the first field, and the theorem does not say that every unramified extension of lies in .
Examples and non-examples
Since is principal, and . Likewise, the Euclidean ring has class number one, so . An imaginary quadratic base need not have a nontrivial Hilbert class field.
By contrast, has class group of order two, as calculated in the ideal-class-group article. Hence . The ideal is nonprincipal and has class of order two. Its Frobenius is therefore the nonidentity automorphism, so remains prime in and has residue degree two. This concerns a prime of ; the rational prime already ramifies in .
The abelian extension is not a Hilbert class field extension of : the prime ramifies, and the real place becomes complex.
Important properties
The Hilbert class field theorem gives a canonical isomorphism
We use arithmetic Frobenius, acting on residue fields by . Inverting all Frobenius elements gives the alternative geometric convention. Since the extension is abelian and unramified, the element does not depend on a choice of prime above .
Consequently , and a nonzero prime ideal splits completely exactly when it is principal. More generally, its residue degree is the order of its class. Every finite abelian extension satisfying the defining local conditions is a subfield of .
Proof outline, assuming global class field theory: quotient the idele class group by the images of all finite local unit groups and all archimedean multiplicative groups. The quotient identifies with the ordinary ideal class group. The existence theorem supplies its finite abelian extension; local reciprocity makes finite inertia trivial and real places split. Global reciprocity identifies the quotient map with the Artin map, proving the stated isomorphism and maximality.
Connections and further reading
Characters of the class group give ideal-character L-functions. The abelian factorization theorem expresses as their product, joining the Galois description to analytic ideal counting. These are generally Hecke L-functions over , rather than ordinary Dirichlet L-functions over . Sutherland, Section 22.6 discusses why the abelian restriction is essential.