Overview
A partial order describes comparisons that respect equality and can be composed, without requiring every pair to be comparable. Inclusion between sets and divisibility between positive integers are basic examples. This language makes it possible to discuss smallest objects, compatible requirements and bounds without first assigning numerical sizes.
Prerequisites
Understand a binary relation on as a subset of , together with implication and equality. The domain is part of the data: a relation may satisfy the order axioms on one domain and fail them on a larger one.
Definition and conventions
A relation on is a partial order if, for all , it satisfies reflexivity , antisymmetry
and transitivity: and imply . The pair is a partially ordered set, or poset. The Chinese title 偏序 names the relation; 偏序集 names the equipped set.
Distinct elements are incomparable if neither comparison holds. A total order additionally requires comparability of every pair. Write when and . This associated strict order is irreflexive and transitive, so it follows a different reflexivity convention.
Intuition
Think of as saying that contains at least the information or requirements present in . Two objects can offer different information without either containing the other. Antisymmetry says that mutual containment identifies the objects; it does not prohibit all comparisons in opposite directions, since equality must remain possible.
For a finite poset, a Hasse diagram draws only covers: covers if and no element lies strictly between them. Upward paths recover the omitted transitive comparisons. Reflexive loops are omitted as well.
Examples and non-examples
Order the positive divisors of by divisibility. Reflexivity follows from ; transitivity follows by multiplying the two quotient integers. If positive divide one another, and give , hence and .
Here and are incomparable. Their greatest common lower bound is , and their least common upper bound is . The word “least” concerns this divisibility order, rather than the ordinary size of the labels.
Restrict instead to with the same relation. Both and are minimal: neither has a smaller member in this domain. Neither is a least element, because neither lies below the other. There is no common lower bound within this restricted set.
Divisibility on all integers is not antisymmetric: divides and divides . Another non-example is the usual strict relation regarded as a non-strict partial order; it fails reflexivity.
Important properties
A least element, if it exists, is unique. If and are both least, then and , so antisymmetry gives equality. The same argument proves uniqueness of a least upper bound. Existence is an additional property, not an order axiom.
Every nonempty finite poset has a minimal element. Proof sketch: keep moving strictly downward while possible. Transitivity and irreflexivity prohibit repetition, so finiteness forces termination. Removing a minimal element repeatedly gives a linear extension: a total order preserving all original comparisons. For the divisor example, is one such extension, and is another.
The finite assumption matters to this argument. The integers in their usual order have no minimal element, so there is no first removal step of that kind.
Connections and further reading
Well-orders add a least-element requirement for every nonempty subset. Inclusion orders organize subspaces, ideals and families of sets. Rooting a tree similarly gives an ancestor order along its unique paths. These are useful preparations for universal constructions, where a candidate is often characterized by a comparison property.
Read Logic and Proof, §§13.1–13.2 and Keller–Trotter, §§6.1 and 6.4 for order conventions, diagrams and linear extensions.